Feature Requests

A-Google Local Pack Tracking B-2 Different Ranking Systems C-3 Pack Makes More Money/Create More Calls Than G Maps *While most people are focusing on MAPS rankings, Maps is not what brings the phone calls and the cash. That is done through the local 3 pack (Google PLACES [which is part of search]). If you look at the 3 pack, then click through to more places, you will see that the url still shows you are in G SEARCH. Click on a listing and take a look at the url, you will see what I am saying is true. If you click through to DIRECTIONS, you will see you are redirected to MAPS. They are 2 separate results data sets. These 2 data sets used to be almost a perfect match to one another, but that is no longer the case. This is something we discovered in April 2025 when we saw our maps rankings start to split even though we weren't doing anything differently and our 3 Pack rankings were staying steady where they were (this happened on keyword search, but was not true for BRANDED searches). A competitor has already released this new tracking system for the different algorithm. Since the MAPS API is not tracking Local Places, this is something we desperately need. After testing for months (April-November) these are our findings. And this is backed up by Sterling Sky as well as many others who have confirmed this change. Being in the Local Places 3 pack is infinitely more valuable (4X-20X according to chat GPT) than ranking is the top 20 of G Maps because this is how searchers discover the BEST (not the closest) match to their search query. For us, this is a must have feature. Thanks, Roger ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1-Your Google Maps Rankings Don’t Match Your Local Pack Rankings Two different Google systems = Two different ranking results. Your business can look like a winner in one and invisible in the other. 2-Google Maps chooses businesses based on: ✔ Distance ✔ Pin accuracy ✔ Hours ✔ Quick convenience Maps = Proximity. It wants the nearest option. 3-What Maps Rewards Maps rewards businesses that are: ➡️ Physically close ➡️ Easy to reach ➡️ Verified and active ➡️ Clear and simple to identify Even if reviews aren’t the best. 4-Local Pack = “Best Match” The Local Pack uses stronger ranking signals: ✔ Reviews ✔ Review velocity ✔ Website authority ✔ Category match ✔ Expertise and trust Local Pack = Quality. It wants the best option. 5-What Local Pack Rewards Local Pack highlights businesses that have: ➡️ More reviews ➡️ Better ratings ➡️ Stronger website content ➡️ A well-built GBP ➡️ Clear subject relevance Even if they’re farther away. 6-Why the Gap Is Growing Maps: ➡️ Shows many businesses ➡️ Expands your search radius ➡️ Simplifies choices Local Pack: ➡️ Filters aggressively ➡️ Only 3 winners ➡️ Prioritizes reputation Different goals → different results. 7-Example of the Split A business can: ⭐ Rank #1 in Maps because it’s close but ⬇️ Rank #7 in Local Pack because competitors have better authority. Or the reverse. ----------------------------------------------------------------

Automatically generate optimized Google Business Profile posts and FAQs using LLM APIs (OpenAI, Gemini…). Saves time, improves consistency, and ensures fresh, SEO-friendly content for every location.

A complete dashboard to display all the modules/data for the client. Like GMB, but with all data.

Nowadays, its no longer viable to focus organic traffic on google and other search engines are growing in popularity like Bing. It would be nice if we can do Bing keyword research because there are only few tools that does this as for now.

More details and filters for backlinks profiles ie.if sponsored, dofollow, nofollow, GB, etc. Overall numbers are given in Overview panels but would be good to be able to filter for specifics.

When analyzing a website, it would be incredibly useful to have an additional column inside top pages that estimates the percentage of the pages that are likely AI-generated vs human-written. For example: AI Content %.

It would be super helpful if SEOUtils kept a history list for: Traffic Analytics: previously checked sites Keyword Analysis: previously checked keywords

I’d love to be able to create “SEO projects” in SEOUtils similar to Ahrefs. Idea: I add a project once (domain + keywords/settings), SEOUtils caches the data, and then I can manually re-run/update that project later without re-entering everything. This would make it much easier to monitor the same keyword sets and sites over time.

Now future in seo is probably mostly local seo... So will be great to add Local Citation Building... as many as possible even if it require additional sunscription for updates/fix errors etc...

Efficiently create optimized content with the AI Content Writer, simplifying your content creation. You don't need to enter an OpenAI API Key. All the models will be loaded in your local machine.