Feature Requests

A-Google Local Pack Tracking B-2 Different Ranking Systems C-3 Pack Makes More Money/Create More Calls Than G Maps *While most people are focusing on MAPS rankings, Maps is not what brings the phone calls and the cash. That is done through the local 3 pack (Google PLACES [which is part of search]). If you look at the 3 pack, then click through to more places, you will see that the url still shows you are in G SEARCH. Click on a listing and take a look at the url, you will see what I am saying is true. If you click through to DIRECTIONS, you will see you are redirected to MAPS. They are 2 separate results data sets. These 2 data sets used to be almost a perfect match to one another, but that is no longer the case. This is something we discovered in April 2025 when we saw our maps rankings start to split even though we weren't doing anything differently and our 3 Pack rankings were staying steady where they were (this happened on keyword search, but was not true for BRANDED searches). A competitor has already released this new tracking system for the different algorithm. Since the MAPS API is not tracking Local Places, this is something we desperately need. After testing for months (April-November) these are our findings. And this is backed up by Sterling Sky as well as many others who have confirmed this change. Being in the Local Places 3 pack is infinitely more valuable (4X-20X according to chat GPT) than ranking is the top 20 of G Maps because this is how searchers discover the BEST (not the closest) match to their search query. For us, this is a must have feature. Thanks, Roger ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1-Your Google Maps Rankings Don’t Match Your Local Pack Rankings Two different Google systems = Two different ranking results. Your business can look like a winner in one and invisible in the other. 2-Google Maps chooses businesses based on: ✔ Distance ✔ Pin accuracy ✔ Hours ✔ Quick convenience Maps = Proximity. It wants the nearest option. 3-What Maps Rewards Maps rewards businesses that are: ➡️ Physically close ➡️ Easy to reach ➡️ Verified and active ➡️ Clear and simple to identify Even if reviews aren’t the best. 4-Local Pack = “Best Match” The Local Pack uses stronger ranking signals: ✔ Reviews ✔ Review velocity ✔ Website authority ✔ Category match ✔ Expertise and trust Local Pack = Quality. It wants the best option. 5-What Local Pack Rewards Local Pack highlights businesses that have: ➡️ More reviews ➡️ Better ratings ➡️ Stronger website content ➡️ A well-built GBP ➡️ Clear subject relevance Even if they’re farther away. 6-Why the Gap Is Growing Maps: ➡️ Shows many businesses ➡️ Expands your search radius ➡️ Simplifies choices Local Pack: ➡️ Filters aggressively ➡️ Only 3 winners ➡️ Prioritizes reputation Different goals → different results. 7-Example of the Split A business can: ⭐ Rank #1 in Maps because it’s close but ⬇️ Rank #7 in Local Pack because competitors have better authority. Or the reverse. ----------------------------------------------------------------

Give the ability to extract the synthetic queries from LLMs via API key. You add a list of keywords, they get quequed in the LLM of choice; you grab the synthetic queries it made and cluster them to this keyword. So in a CSV you will have Cluster | Keyword | Synthetic queries for this keyword

Implement a system to continuously monitor and protect Google Business Profiles (GBPs) from unauthorized changes, suspensions, and malicious activity. This feature would provide real-time alerts, and potentially automated change reversion. This will safeguard local SEO efforts, improve GMB Rank Tracker data accuracy, and provide peace of mind for users. Details: This feature should include: Continuous monitoring of GBP data (name, address, phone, website, etc.). Immediate alerts for unauthorized changes or suspension risks. If possible, automated reversion to correct info. Suspension guidance. Consider leveraging the Business Profile Management and Performance APIs (the same APIs planned for the GMB Rank Tracker update).

Now future in seo is probably mostly local seo... So will be great to add Local Citation Building... as many as possible even if it require additional sunscription for updates/fix errors etc...

A complete dashboard to display all the modules/data for the client. Like GMB, but with all data.

Discover trending topics, helping you to create relevant and engaging content

something like this...is it possible? https://whitespark.ca/local-citation-finder/

Efficiently create optimized content with the AI Content Writer, simplifying your content creation. You don't need to enter an OpenAI API Key. All the models will be loaded in your local machine.

I propose to enhance SEOUtils.app by integrating a dynamic schema markup generation tool that utilizes AI to create tailored structured data for websites. This feature aims to support users in improving their website’s indexability across search engines such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo. Key Features: Dynamic Schema Creation: Automatically generate custom schema markup for various types of content, including pages, blogs, and services. Allow users to select from a range of schema types relevant to their content, ensuring that each page is optimally structured. Boost SEO Visibility in the AI Era: Enhance the comprehension of content by search engines, leading to improved rankings and eligibility for rich snippets. Provide insights into how structured data can positively impact search visibility. Effortless Integration: Facilitate a one-click implementation process for adding schema markup to web pages, significantly reducing the time and technical effort required by users. Ensure that users without coding experience can easily apply schema markup to their websites. Local SEO Schema Markup Generator: Incorporate a dedicated feature for generating local SEO related schema markup, which is essential for businesses targeting local customers. Support common local business types, enhancing their visibility in local search results. Schema Markup Validator and Testing Tool: Include a built-in schema markup validation and testing tool to allow users to verify their structured data before implementation. Provide feedback on errors or recommendations to optimize their schema, ensuring compliance with search engine standards.

If there is enough demand, this would be a great extension to the rank tracker. Here is an example report which is very detailed: https://member.gmbbriefcase.com/gbp-analysis-report/y4XFPr6UjfomCSZ# One feature I haven't seen in any GBP Audits is localization, maybe some day..